We parent differently -- he is too strict, I am too soft. How do we settle this?ask your rav
The sources advise discussing parenting without undermining the other parent, agreeing on shared rules where the strict and the soft parent learn from each other, and seeking outside advice, especially when there's real concern about a serious mistake.
The author states up front that he's working from two conditions: this isn't a case of real abuse, and the issue has already been discussed openly and calmly for a long time, without result. At that impasse, his first suggested step is to turn to whoever you'd normally ask for life advice, ideally a rav, or at least an older, wise person with an objective view. He notes that anything that harms the marriage harms the children, and in most cases the harm from a spouse's disciplinary style is far smaller than the harm from parents fighting -- and the real question is whether you're actually right. This advice doesn't apply to a situation of abuse.
“Why are you so sure you're right?”
In the case he brings, the wife describes the punishments as "a bit harsh," and the husband refuses to ask anyone's opinion. The author reminds us that parenting has to take a particular child's nature into account. For small differences he advises consistency between the parents; where there's concern about a serious mistake, a conversation with a recognized Torah authority who understands chinuch.
“If a husband or wife refuses to consult anyone, it points to a fear of not finding anyone who would agree with them.”
The author advises explaining positively to the child what to do, and backing each other up on discipline. Disagreements between parents should be discussed privately, and punishments should never shame the child in front of others.
“It is crucial that one parent not criticize the other's disciplinary actions in front of the child.”
An approach to chinuch needs to be worked out together and practically: if the wife keeps the schedule while a "wind"-type husband chases the children's smiles, they're working at cross purposes; if warmth and spontaneity come from the wife, it matters for the husband not to devalue them, but also to help bring some order into the children's lives -- otherwise the children feel loved but arrive at school unprepared and don't reach their potential. In his analysis, the strict and the soft parent each act out of the extremes of their own nature: the impatience of the "fire" type turns lessons into drilling with shouting, and the "wind" type's dislike of conflict makes the father "slip away" from demands he'd have to stand behind. Neither approach is complete, and each has to learn from the other. He also shows the cost of quick strictness: "one more word and we're not going anywhere" buys instant quiet but not peace, while patient give-and-take -- a little empathy, a little nudging -- brings both sides to common ground; what you do consistently, day after day, is what pays off exceptionally.
“He would have achieved instant quiet, but not peace.”
Related questions
